{"id":1128,"date":"2022-02-26T02:42:40","date_gmt":"2022-02-26T02:42:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/trujilloabogados.mx\/?p=1128"},"modified":"2022-05-04T00:12:27","modified_gmt":"2022-05-04T00:12:27","slug":"declaratoria-de-invalidez-de-diversos-preceptos-de-la-ley-nacional-de-extincion-de-dominio-por-parte-de-la-scjn","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/trujilloabogados.mx\/eng\/declaratoria-de-invalidez-de-diversos-preceptos-de-la-ley-nacional-de-extincion-de-dominio-por-parte-de-la-scjn\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Ruling Against Various Provisions of the Mexican Law on Asset Forfeiture"},"content":{"rendered":"<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"1128\" class=\"elementor elementor-1128\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-ada19dc elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"ada19dc\" data-element_type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-82e0a9e\" data-id=\"82e0a9e\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-284022e elementor-widget elementor-widget-image\" data-id=\"284022e\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"image.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t<style>\/*! elementor - v3.23.0 - 05-08-2024 *\/\n.elementor-widget-image{text-align:center}.elementor-widget-image a{display:inline-block}.elementor-widget-image a img[src$=\".svg\"]{width:48px}.elementor-widget-image img{vertical-align:middle;display:inline-block}<\/style>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1056\" height=\"680\" src=\"https:\/\/trujilloabogados.mx\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/2.png\" class=\"attachment-full size-full wp-image-1138\" alt=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/trujilloabogados.mx\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/2.png 1056w, https:\/\/trujilloabogados.mx\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/2-300x193.png 300w, https:\/\/trujilloabogados.mx\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/2-1024x659.png 1024w, https:\/\/trujilloabogados.mx\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/2-768x495.png 768w, https:\/\/trujilloabogados.mx\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/2-18x12.png 18w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1056px) 100vw, 1056px\" \/>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-6f56975 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"6f56975\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t<style>\/*! elementor - v3.23.0 - 05-08-2024 *\/\n.elementor-widget-text-editor.elementor-drop-cap-view-stacked .elementor-drop-cap{background-color:#69727d;color:#fff}.elementor-widget-text-editor.elementor-drop-cap-view-framed .elementor-drop-cap{color:#69727d;border:3px solid;background-color:transparent}.elementor-widget-text-editor:not(.elementor-drop-cap-view-default) .elementor-drop-cap{margin-top:8px}.elementor-widget-text-editor:not(.elementor-drop-cap-view-default) .elementor-drop-cap-letter{width:1em;height:1em}.elementor-widget-text-editor .elementor-drop-cap{float:left;text-align:center;line-height:1;font-size:50px}.elementor-widget-text-editor .elementor-drop-cap-letter{display:inline-block}<\/style>\t\t\t\t<p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On January 6, 2022, the ruling on theUnconstitutionality Action 100\/2019, filed onSeptember 9, 2019 by the National Human Rights Commission against various provisions of theNational Law on Asset Forfeiture (the \"Law\") and resolved by the Plenary of the Supreme Court ofJustice (the \u201cSCJN\u201d) in June 2021, was published in the Official Gazette of the Federation.<\/p><p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The SCJN, in its ruling, although invalidated some ofthe challenged provisions of the Law, the rest still subsist and remains in force. The declarations ofinvalidity formally took effect as of June 22, 2021, the date on which the Federal Congress was notified of the resolutions of the ruling by means of Notices 5024\/2021 and 5025\/2021, without retroactive effects to previous ongoing proceedings.\u00a0<\/p><p style=\"font-weight: 400;\" class=\"translation-block\">Generally speaking, the resolutions adopted by theSCJN with respect to the Unconstitutionality Actionof the Law establish that (i) asset forfeiture only applies to assets whose legitimate origin cannot be proven, element that refers punctually to the origin of the assets and not to their use or destination, as established in the Law; (ii) the action of assetforfeiture proceeds with respect to criminal conducts set forth in federal, general and local laws; (iii) the action of asset forfeiture under no circumstances has unlimited statute of limitations; (iv) the District Attorney may not access databases of other authorities, nor order the securing of assets as a provisional measure, without prior court order; and (v) one of the grounds for the early sale ofassets by the authority that established that thedisposal was necessary due to the \u201cnature of theasset\u201d is removed, since such circumstance was ambiguous and generated uncertainty as to theassets that fell into such category.<\/p><p style=\"font-weight: 400;\" class=\"translation-block\">Finally, regarding the requirements to assume that an acquisition was made in good faith, it was necessary to prove, among other things, (a) theincapability of the purchaser to know that the assetsubject to forfeiture action was used as instrument, object or product of an illegal act or to hide or mix assets resulting from the illegal act; and (b) in theevent of having learned of the unlawful use of theasset, to have prevented or given a timely notice to the competent authority, elements that are invalidated and will no longer be required to prove good faith.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-b1cc5a6 elementor-align-center elementor-widget elementor-widget-raven-button\" data-id=\"b1cc5a6\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-settings=\"{&quot;turn_to_popup_action_button&quot;:&quot;no&quot;}\" data-widget_type=\"raven-button.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"raven-widget-wrapper\">\n\t\t\t<a class=\"raven-button raven-button-widget-normal-effect-none  raven-button-text-align-center raven-button-link elementor-animation-none\" href=\"https:\/\/trujilloabogados.mx\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/National-Law-on-Asset-Forfeiture_v02.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">\t\t\t\t<div class=\"raven-button-overlay\" ><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<span class=\"raven-button-content\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"button-text-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"raven-button-icon raven-button-icon-position-left\">\n\t\t\t\t<i aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"far fa-file-pdf\"><\/i>\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"raven-button-texts-wrapper\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"button-text\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"raven-button-text\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDownload\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<\/a>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>El pasado 6 de enero de 2022 se public\u00f3 en el Diario\u00a0Oficial de la Federaci\u00f3n la sentencia sobre la Acci\u00f3n de Inconstitucionalidad 100\/2019, promovida el 9 de septiembre de 2019 por la Comisi\u00f3n Nacional de Derechos Humanos en contra de diversas disposiciones de la Ley Nacional de Extinci\u00f3n de Dominio (la \u201cLey\u201d) y resuelta por [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1138,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1128","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-publicaciones"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/trujilloabogados.mx\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1128","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/trujilloabogados.mx\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/trujilloabogados.mx\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trujilloabogados.mx\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trujilloabogados.mx\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1128"}],"version-history":[{"count":27,"href":"https:\/\/trujilloabogados.mx\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1128\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1222,"href":"https:\/\/trujilloabogados.mx\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1128\/revisions\/1222"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trujilloabogados.mx\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1138"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/trujilloabogados.mx\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1128"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trujilloabogados.mx\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1128"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/trujilloabogados.mx\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1128"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}